Proudly afflicting the comfortable [and collecting shiny things] since March 2003

Send Magpie an email!


RSS Feeds
Click button to subscribe.

Subscribe to Magpie via Feedburner  Magpie's RSS feed via Bloglines
Add to Netvibes

Need a password?
Click the button!


Bypass 'free' registration!


Cost of the Iraq War [US$]
(JavaScript Error)
[Find out more here]

Hooded Liberty


BLOGS WE LIKE
3quarksdaily
Alas, a Blog
alphabitch
Back to Iraq
Baghdad Burning
Bitch Ph.D.
blac (k) ademic
Blog Report
Blogs by Women
BOPNews
Broadsheet
Burnt Orange Report
Confined Space
Cursor
Daily Kos
Dangereuse trilingue
Echidne of the Snakes
Effect Measure
Eschaton (Atrios)
feministe
Feministing
Firedoglake
Follow Me Here
gendergeek
Gordon.Coale
The Housing Bubble New!
I Blame the Patriarchy
Juan Cole/Informed Comment
Kicking Ass
The King's Blog
The Krile Files
Left Coaster
librarian.net
Loaded Orygun
Making Light
Marian's Blog
mediagirl
Muslim Wake Up! Blog
My Left Wing
NathanNewman.org
The NewsHoggers
Null Device
Orcinus
Pacific Views
Pandagon
The Panda's Thumb
Pedantry
Peking Duck
Philobiblon
Pinko Feminist Hellcat
Political Animal
Reality-Based Community
Riba Rambles
The Rittenhouse Review
Road to Surfdom
Romenesko
SCOTUSblog
The Sideshow
The Silence of Our Friends New!
Sisyphus Shrugged
skippy
Suburban Guerrilla
Talk Left
Talking Points Memo
TAPPED
This Modern World
The Unapologetic Mexican New!
veiled4allah
Wampum
War and Piece
wood s lot
xymphora

MISSING IN ACTION
Body and Soul
fafblog
General Glut's Globlog
Respectful of Otters
RuminateThis


Image by Propaganda Remix Project. Click to see more.


WHO'S IN CHARGE HERE?
Magpie is a former journalist, attempted historian [No, you can't ask how her thesis is going], and full-time corvid of the lesbian persuasion. She keeps herself in birdseed by writing those bad computer manuals that you toss out without bothering to read them. She also blogs too much when she's not on deadline, both here and at Pacific Views.

Magpie roosts in Portland, Oregon, where she annoys her housemates (as well as her cats Medea, Whiskers, and Jane Doe) by attempting to play Irish music on the fiddle and concertina.

If you like, you can send Magpie an email!



WHO LINKS TO MAGPIE?
Ask Technorati.
Or ask WhoLinksToMe.


Politics Blog Top Sites

Progressive Women's Blog Ring

Join | List |
Previous | Next | Random |
Previous 5 | Next 5 |
Skip Previous | Skip Next

Powered by RingSurf



Creative Commons License


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Check to open links in new windows. Uncheck to see comments.


Friday, September 7, 2007

Step right up folks! See the amazing disappearing benchmarks!

Although our Dear Leader doesn't recall the benchmarks that he himself set up for judging the success of the surge in Iraq, Salon's Tim Grieve remembers them quite well indeed.

This magpie wants to think that the Democrats in Congress will remember Dubya's benchmarks—and how very few of them have been met—when they pass judgment on the surge later this month. I'm not holding my breath, though.

Labels: , , ,


| | Posted by Magpie at 12:12 AM | Get permalink



Thursday, September 6, 2007

Too busy to blog.

I'm doing research for a possible new job, so there won't be any new posts until this evening at the earliest. Thanks for your patience!

Labels:


| | Posted by Magpie at 3:20 PM | Get permalink



Wednesday, September 5, 2007

Riverbend resurfaces ...

... as one of the 1.4 million Iraqis who've fled their country and are living as refugees in Syria. Here's her latest post.

(For more on Iraqi refugees in Syria and Jordan, see this earlier Magpie post.)

Via Baghdad Burning.

| | Posted by Magpie at 3:57 PM | Get permalink



Earth to Dubya, Earth to Dubya ...

This magpie really has to wonder what planet our Dear Leader is on after reading this account of his arrival in Australia:

"We're kicking ass," he told Mark Vaile on the tarmac after the Deputy Prime Minister inquired politely of the President's stopover in Iraq en route to Sydney. [Emaphsis and incredulity added]

The word 'delusional' doesn't even begin to cover it.

Via Sydney Morning Herald.

Labels: , , , , ,


| | Posted by Magpie at 3:30 PM | Get permalink



Cast your memory back to Central America in the 1980s.

Remember those death squads that operated in El Salvador and Honduras? The ones that were covertly supported—if not actually organized—by the Reagan administration with the aim of killing off leftists, political activists, labor leaders, and other 'communists'?

It appears that the El Salvador death squads are still operating, twenty years later.

[Lawyer Jaime Martínez of the Institute of Comparative Studies in Criminal and Social Science] said that 622 possible cases of death squad killings were documented ... between January 2001 and August 2005.

In 2006, [El Salvador's] Human Rights Ombudsman's Office (PDDH) reported the case of a young man, Abimilet Ramírez, who after being picked up by the police was thrown down a well.

He survived, and there were witnesses who saw him being seized by the police. But he was killed later, after he and the PDDH reported his case to the public prosecutor's office.

Investigations by human rights organisations have found that these incidents form part of "homicidal practices" that "year after year have been seen in the post-war period, and up to the present, and that are carried out with the acquiescence of high-ranking authorities," [David] Morales said in a television interview. [Morales is a lawyer with the Catholic church’s legal aid office in San Salvador.]

This magpie has to wonder how long the death squads now causing havoc in Iraq will continue operating after the US finally withdraws its troops.

Via IPS News.

Labels: , ,


| | Posted by Magpie at 12:31 AM | Get permalink



What kind of news do people want?

Not celebrity scandals, despite the evidence of numerous US newscasts. Unfortunately, people aren't much interested in foreign news or science news either. And, even worse, fewer people are interested in news at all than they were 10 years ago.

Here's a quick summary of the results of a recent study by the Pew Research Center for People & the Press:


Pew Research Center data on news preferences

[Table and Data: Pew Research Center for People & the Press]


What I find really interesting is that very little has changed over the two decades of news coverage included in the study. Other than a big increase of public interest in stories about money, and a big loss of interest in stories about disasters, peoples' interests in the news now are remarkably similar to what they were in the mid-1980s. This is, of course, despite news media apologists who always say that they're 'just giving the public what it wants' whenever critics complain about the current state of print and broadcast news in the US.

The Columbia Journalism Review has a nice summary of the Pew Institute's findings here. You can look at the Pew study in detail over here.

Labels: , ,


| | Posted by Magpie at 12:01 AM | Get permalink



Tuesday, September 4, 2007

No future.

And I thought I was pessimistic about the state of the US. I've got nothing on Chris Floyd, who's already willing to write an obituary for the American republic:

The annus horribilis of 2007 has turned out to be a year of triumph for the Bush Faction -- the hit men who delivered the coup de grâce to the long-moribund Republic. Bush was written off as a lame duck after the Democrat's November 2006 election "triumph" (in fact, the narrowest of victories eked out despite an orgy of cheating and fixing by the losers), and the subsequent salvo of Establishment consensus from the Iraq Study Group, advocating a de-escalation of the war in Iraq. Then came a series of scandals, investigations, high-profile resignations, even the criminal conviction of a top White House official. But despite all this -- and abysmal poll ratings as well -- over the past eight months Bush and his coupsters have seen every single element of their violent tyranny confirmed, countenanced and extended.

he war which we were told the Democrats and ISG consensus would end or wind down has of course been escalated to its greatest level yet -- more troops, more airstrikes, more mercenaries, more Iraqi captives swelling the mammoth prison camps of the occupying power, more instability destroying the very fabric of Iraqi society. The patently illegal surveillance programs of the authoritarian regime have now been codified into law by the Democratic Congress, which has also let stand the evisceration of habeas corpus in the Military Commissions Act, and a raft of other liberty-stripping laws, rules, regulations and executive orders. Bush's self-proclaimed arbitrary power to seize American citizens (and others) without charge and hold them indefinitely -- even kill them -- has likewise been unchallenged by the legislators. Bush has brazenly defied Congressional subpoenas -- and even arbitrarily stripped the Justice Department of the power to enforce them -- to no other reaction than a stern promise from Democratic leaders to "look further into this matter." His spokesmen -- and his "signing statements" -- now openly proclaim his utter disdain for representative government, and assert at every turn his sovereign right to "interpret" -- or ignore -- legislation as he wishes. He retains the right to "interpret" just which interrogation techniques are classified as torture and which are not, while his concentration camp at Guantanamo Bay and his secret CIA prisons -- where those "strenuous" techniques are practiced -- remain open. His increasingly brazen drive to war with Iran has already been endorsed unanimously by the Senate and overwhelmingly by the House, both of which have embraced the specious casus belli concocted by the Bush Regime. And to come full circle, Democratic leaders like Hillary Clinton and Carl Levin are now praising the "military success" of the Iraq escalation -- despite the evident failure of its stated goals by every single measure, including troop deaths, civilian deaths, security, infrastructure, political cohesion and regional stability. This emerging "bipartisan consensus" on the military situation in Iraq (or rather, this utter fantasy concealing a rapidly deteriorating reality) makes it certain that the September "progress report" will be greeted as a justification for continuing the "surge" in one form or another.

It is, by any measure, a remarkable achievement, one of the greatest political feats ever. Despite Bush's standing as one of the most despised presidents in American history, despite a Congress in control of the opposition party, despite a solid majority opposed to his policies and his war, despite an Administration riddled with scandal and crime, despite the glaring rot in the nation's infrastructure and the callous abandonment of one of the nation's major cities to natural disaster and crony greed -- despite all of this, and much more that would have brought down or mortally wounded any government in a democratic country, the Bush Administration is now in a far stronger position than it was a year ago.

How can this be? The answer is simple: the United States is no longer a democratic country, or even a degraded semblance of one.

I know I say this a lot, but ... it's really worth your time to go read the entire post.

My view of our current political situation in the US isn't quite as dark as Floyd's, but he makes a very persuasive argument about the degree of danger to democracy that Dubya, his minions, and his Democratic enablers represent. Dismissing his argument as paranoia only makes it more certain that the tombstone will soon be placed over the grave of the long democratic experiment in the US.

Via The Sideshow.

Labels: , , , , , ,


| | Posted by Magpie at 1:20 PM | Get permalink



Pop quiz!

Quick! What's missing from The Economist's list of the 15 most democratic countries in the world?


Economist rankings of most democratic countries

Something's missing here.


You get half credit if you couldn't find the UK, but what I'm really wanting you to notice is that the US isn't there either. To find the US, you have to look at the complete listing of the world's full democracies. There are 28 of them, and the US is #17, right between Spain and the Czech Republic. (And, if you are wondering, the UK is #23.)

Here's some of how The Economist explains that positioning:

One advantage of our index compared with others is that it provides for considerable differentiation of scores, including among developed countries. The “near-perfect” democracy is Sweden, the country with the highest score. The other Nordic countries also have high ranks. By contrast, the United States and Britain are near the bottom of the full democracy category, but for somewhat different reasons. America falls down on some aspects of governance and civil liberties. Despite low election turnouts, political participation in the United States is comparatively high. In Britain low political participation (the lowest in the developed world) is a major problem, and to a lesser extent, for now, so are eroding civil liberties. [Emphasis added]

Just how far has the US fallen down on civil liberties? Well, the US of A has the lowest civil liberties score of any of the 29 'full democracies' on the list, and scores worse than more than 20 of the 50 'flawed democracies' rated by The Economist.

Remember when the US would have been near the top of this or any similar list? Hopefully the results of next year's presidential elections will reverse the sad trend set in motion by Dubya's two terms in office.

By the way, the worst country of the 167 that The Economist rated is North Korea. Iraq came in at #112, just one position away from dropping onto the 'Authoritarian Regimes' roster. No such luck for the US' steadfast Mideast ally, Saudi Arabia, which is #156.

You can read a summary of the Economist's findings if you go here, and you can download the full Democracy Index (along with a description of the methodology used to generate the list) if you click here [PDF file].

Labels: ,


| | Posted by Magpie at 12:19 AM | Get permalink



Monday, September 3, 2007

Little or no blogging today.

Faced with having to comment on Dubya's  visit to  photo-op in Iraq or—even worse—having to say anything about this, taking the day off seems to be a wise move.

See y'all tomorrow.

Labels: , , ,


| | Posted by Magpie at 12:04 PM | Get permalink



Sunday, September 2, 2007

The upcoming attack on Iran.

Over at Daily Kos, Maccabee has a much-linked and much-commented upon post in which he relays news from a friend who's a Landing Signals Officer in a US Navy carrier group stationed near Iran. According to the friend, the preparations for an attack on Iran are done and, she says, the military needs only the word from Washington for the bombs to start dropping.

In reading the post, though, I found the following part of the LSO's comments scarier than the news that an attack could be imminent:

"I know this will sound crazy coming from a Naval officer", she said. "But we’re all just waiting for this administration to end. Things that happen at the senior officer level seem more and more to happen outside of the purview of XOs and other officers who typically have a say-so in daily combat and flight operations. Today, orders just come down from the mountaintop and there’s no questioning. In fact, there is no discussing it. I have seen more than one senior commander disappear and then three weeks later we find out that he has been replaced. That’s really weird. It’s also really weird because everyone who has disappeared has questioned whether or not we should be staging a massive attack on Iran."

"We’re not stupid. Most of the members of the fleet read well enough to know what is going on world-wise. We also realize that anyone who has any doubts is in danger of having a long military career yanked out from under them. Keep in mind that most of the people I serve with are happy to be a part of the global war on terror. It’s just that the touch points are what we see since we are the ones out here who are supposedly implementing this grand strategy. But when you liason with administration officials who don’t know that Iranians don’t speak Arabic and have no idea what Iranians live like, then you start having second thoughts about whether these Administration officials are even competent." [Emphasis added]

I don't know what I can possibly add to that. Be very afraid.

Labels: , ,


| | Posted by Magpie at 5:01 PM | Get permalink




Liar, liar, pants on fire!


NEWS HEADLINES

Mail & Guardian [S. Africa]
NEWS LINKS
BBC News
CBC News
Agence France Presse
Reuters
Associated Press
Aljazeera
Inter Press Service
Watching America
International Herald Tribune
Guardian (UK)
Independent (UK)
USA Today
NY Times (US)
Washington Post (US)
McClatchy Washington Bureau (US)
Boston Globe (US)
LA Times (US)
Globe & Mail (Canada)
Toronto Star (Canada)
Sydney Morning Herald (Australia)
AllAfrica.com
Mail & Guardian (South Africa)
Al-Ahram (Egypt)
Daily Star (Lebanon)
Haaretz (Israel)
Hindustan Times (India)
Japan Times (Japan)
Asia Times (Hong Kong)
EurasiaNet
New Scientist News
Paper Chase
OpenCongress

COMMENT & ANALYSIS
Molly Ivins
CJR Daily
Women's eNews
Raw Story
The Gadflyer
Working for Change
Common Dreams
AlterNet
Truthdig
Truthout
Salon
Democracy Now!
American Microphone
rabble
The Revealer
Current
Editor & Publisher
Economic Policy Institute
Center for American Progress
The Memory Hole


Irish-American fiddler Liz Carroll

IRISH MUSIC
Céilí House (RTE Radio)
TheSession.org
The Irish Fiddle
Fiddler Magazine
Concertina.net
Concertina Library
A Guide to the Irish Flute
Chiff & Fipple
Irtrad-l Archives
Ceolas
Comhaltas Ceoltoiri Eireann
BBC Virtual Session
JC's ABC Tune Finder

SHINY THINGS
alt.portland
Propaganda Remix Project
Ask a Ninja
grow-a-brain
Boiling Point
Bruno
Cat and Girl
Dykes to Watch Out For
Library of Congress
American Heritage Dictionary
Dictonary of Newfoundland English
American's Guide to Canada
Digital History of the San Fernando Valley
MetaFilter
Blithe House Quarterly
Astronomy Pic of the Day
Earth Science Picture of the Day
Asia Grace
Gaelic Curse Engine
Old Dinosaur Books



ARCHIVES